VO2 max is one of the most widely used measures of cardiorespiratory fitness. It describes the highest rate at which your body can take in, transport, and use oxygen during intense aerobic exercise.
The number becomes useful only after you add context.
A VO2 max of 35 mL/kg/min can sit near the median for one age and sex group while ranking well above the median for another. Interpretation also changes depending on whether the result came from laboratory testing, a field test, or a wearable estimate.
This guide provides age- and sex-based reference percentiles and explains how to read your number without treating one chart or one wearable result as a universal fitness grade.
A good VO2 max is a result that compares favorably with an appropriate reference group and supports your personal health or performance goals.
Use four questions:
Percentiles provide clearer context than labels such as “good” or “excellent,” because those labels vary between charts.
| Percentile Position | Practical Interpretation |
|---|---|
| Below 25th | Lower quartile of the matching reference group |
| 25th–49th | Below the group median |
| Around 50th | Near the group median |
| 50th–74th | Above the group median |
| 75th–94th | High relative cardiorespiratory fitness |
| 95th or higher | Very high relative to the reference group |
These percentiles describe population position. They are not diagnostic thresholds or mandatory fitness targets.
The table below uses updated U.S. treadmill cardiopulmonary exercise testing reference values. All numbers are in mL/kg/min.
| Age | 25th Percentile | 50th Percentile | 75th Percentile | 95th Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 20–29 | 37.3 | 45.4 | 52.6 | 62.1 |
| 30–39 | 31.3 | 38.6 | 46.5 | 57.9 |
| 40–49 | 28.4 | 34.8 | 41.8 | 53.2 |
| 50–59 | 23.9 | 29.4 | 35.5 | 46.8 |
| 60–69 | 19.7 | 24.4 | 29.9 | 40.2 |
| 70–79 | 16.8 | 20.6 | 25.0 | 35.2 |
| 80–89 | 15.9 | 17.7 | 20.9 | 25.6 |
| Age | 25th Percentile | 50th Percentile | 75th Percentile | 95th Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 20–29 | 28.6 | 35.6 | 42.2 | 50.1 |
| 30–39 | 23.1 | 28.3 | 34.5 | 45.5 |
| 40–49 | 21.3 | 25.9 | 30.9 | 40.7 |
| 50–59 | 19.5 | 23.1 | 27.3 | 35.3 |
| 60–69 | 16.4 | 19.4 | 23.1 | 29.7 |
| 70–79 | 14.8 | 17.1 | 20.0 | 24.2 |
| 80–89 | 12.8 | 15.1 | 17.2 | 20.7 |
Reference note: These are directly measured treadmill CPET percentiles from apparently healthy U.S. adults. The original dataset used male and female categories. Results from other populations, test protocols, and exercise modes may differ.
Start with your age row and the sex category used by the reference dataset.
Suppose a 45-year-old man has a directly measured treadmill VO2 value of:
35 mL/kg/min
For men aged 40–49, the updated reference median is 34.8. The result is therefore close to the 50th percentile.
Now consider the same value for a 45-year-old woman.
For women aged 40–49, 35 falls above the 75th-percentile value of 30.9 and below the 95th-percentile value of 40.7.
The number stayed the same. Its population context changed.

Relative VO2 max is usually expressed as:
milliliters of oxygen per kilogram of body mass per minute
This allows oxygen use to be interpreted relative to body size.
Laboratories can also report absolute oxygen consumption in liters per minute. Relative and absolute values answer related but different questions.
| Metric | Unit | What It Describes |
|---|---|---|
| Absolute oxygen uptake | L/min | Total oxygen used per minute |
| Relative oxygen uptake | mL/kg/min | Oxygen use adjusted for body mass |
Body mass is part of the relative VO2 calculation.
If body weight decreases while absolute oxygen-consuming capacity remains similar, the relative value in mL/kg/min can rise.
If body weight increases, the relative value can fall even when absolute oxygen uptake changes less.
When interpreting a long-term trend, review both training changes and meaningful changes in body mass.
Population VO2 max values generally decrease across adulthood.
Contributors can include changes in:
The chart describes population trends. Regular aerobic training can help maintain much higher cardiorespiratory fitness than an inactive lifestyle at the same age.
For a broader explanation of the physiology, see how cardiovascular capacity relates to VO2 max and endurance.
| Method | How It Works | Best Use |
|---|---|---|
| Laboratory CPET | Measures respiratory gases during progressively harder exercise | Direct aerobic-capacity assessment |
| Field test | Uses distance, time, heart rate, or recovery in a prediction equation | Accessible fitness estimate |
| Wearable estimate | Uses an algorithm based on exercise, heart rate, pace, activity, and profile data | Convenient repeated trend tracking |
A laboratory CPET directly measures oxygen and carbon-dioxide exchange while workload increases.
A wearable estimates aerobic capacity from indirect inputs. The displayed result can be useful while remaining method-dependent.
A wearable estimate can be affected by:
Two platforms can also use different algorithms and produce different values from similar exercise data.
Use one system consistently when following a trend.
A wearable algorithm can perform well across a group while still producing a meaningful error for an individual.
Positive and negative errors can cancel each other when researchers calculate the group average.
This means a wearable value may place you in a different percentile band from a directly measured result.
Use wearable VO2 max primarily to answer:
“Is my estimate moving consistently over several weeks or months?”
The tables in this article use treadmill CPET reference values.
Cycle-ergometer testing can produce a different result because it uses a different movement pattern, active muscle mass, and exercise-specific training background.
Use:
treadmill result → treadmill reference
and:
cycle result → cycle reference.
A trained cyclist may also perform differently from someone who primarily runs.

VO2 max describes maximal aerobic capacity.
Endurance performance also depends on:
Two runners with similar VO2 max values can therefore produce different race times.
A practical interpretation sequence is:
Measure → Match the Reference → Check the Method → Track the Trend
Identify whether the value came from laboratory testing, a field test, or a wearable.
Use the appropriate age, sex, and exercise-mode reference.
Avoid treating estimates and direct measurements as interchangeable.
Compare repeated results collected with the same system and broadly similar conditions.
The RingConn baseline guide explains why repeated personal data is more informative than isolated measurements.
Cardiorespiratory fitness responds to consistent aerobic training.
A balanced program can include:
Lower-intensity work supports training consistency and aerobic volume. Higher-intensity work provides a more direct stimulus near maximal aerobic demand.
Use our heart rate zones guide and Zone 2 vs. Zone 3 comparison to understand how intensity changes the training stimulus and recovery cost.
RingConn's current product comparison lists VO2 max functionality across the current ring lineup.
The available experience can depend on the current model, App version, workout data, and supported configuration.
RingConn VO2 max information should be treated as a wellness and fitness estimate unless the value comes from a directly measured laboratory result.
Its strongest use is combining the VO2 max trend with broader context such as:
Check the current RingConn product comparison for model-specific feature availability.
A supervised laboratory test can be useful when you:
Seek appropriate medical evaluation for chest pain, fainting, severe dizziness, significant unexplained shortness of breath, or a major unexplained decline in exercise capacity.
A VO2 max number needs four types of context:
Measurement Method + Age and Sex Percentile + Exercise Mode + Personal Trend
The updated treadmill reference tables show that expected values generally decline with age and differ between the male and female categories used by the dataset.
Percentiles are more transparent than universal “good” or “excellent” labels. They tell you where a directly measured result sits within a matching reference group.
Laboratory CPET directly measures respiratory gases during progressively demanding exercise. Wearables estimate aerobic capacity from indirect signals and are especially useful for repeated trend tracking.
Use the same device or testing method, compare similar conditions, and give multi-week changes more weight than one isolated estimate.
RingConn products are intended for personal health, fitness, and wellness awareness and are not medical devices. VO2 max estimates, heart rate, HRV, activity, sleep, and other RingConn wellness information should not replace cardiopulmonary exercise testing, professional medical advice, diagnosis, emergency assessment, or treatment.
Compare your result with the matching age-, sex-, and test-specific percentile table. A result near the 50th percentile is around the group median, while the 75th percentile or higher indicates relatively high cardiorespiratory fitness within that reference group.
It depends on age, sex, testing method, and exercise mode. A value of 40 can sit below the median for a young male reference group while ranking well above the median for many older or female reference groups.
Accuracy varies by device, algorithm, fitness level, workout type, and sensor data. Exercise-based algorithms often perform better than models relying mainly on resting information, but individual estimates can still differ materially from laboratory results.
Laboratory CPET directly measures oxygen and carbon-dioxide exchange during progressive exercise. A wearable uses indirect inputs to estimate aerobic capacity, making laboratory testing the stronger method when precise measurement is required.
The chart in this article uses treadmill reference values. Cycling results should be interpreted with cycle-specific standards because exercise mode can materially change the measured value.
Relative VO2 max is divided by body mass. A change in weight can therefore alter the mL/kg/min result even when absolute oxygen-consuming capacity changes less.
Wearable estimates can be reviewed as a multi-week or monthly trend. Laboratory testing is usually repeated less frequently and should use a comparable protocol when tracking change.